A Windows Server 2012 failover cluster requires shared storage, which can be an iSCSI, Serially Attached SCSI, or Fibre Channel SAN. In my failover cluster, I configured an iSCSI SAN. After completing the iSCSI configuration, the iSCSI Initiator Targets tab was populated with the LUNs. To ensure that these LUNs would be automatically. HPE Nimble Storage All Flash Arrays - Product documentation. QuickSpecs Language Last modified date. Business white papers Language Last modified date. Brochures Language Last modified date. Data sheets Language Last modified date. Solution briefs Language Last modified date. Technical white papers Language.
Hi there Dmitriy,
lf I can summáry from above claims, what can make Nimble't Active/Passive design is distinctive/different likened to another storage suppliers style.
Where various energetic/passive designs differ, is usually the period to fall short over is definitely even much longer than non-symmetric energetic/active styles. A VNXe can take over a minutes, a Dell EqualLogic can get 35 secs. If this is certainly more time than an quick you risk IO timeouts on applications; postponed write downfalls; NTFS file corruption error; EXT4 heading read only; and usually angry customers.
I've never ever tested a Nimble fór failover; I'michael curious how longer it will consider.
Mark is place on for Energetic/Passive designs.they can very seriously affect failover periods and therefore data access. This is certainly why we pertain to the Nimble structures as Dynamic/Standby. The Standby control is always up and operating (it'h actually doing a few minor items in the background) it's simply not digesting host I/O fill. In situation of failover it's study to take on the weight seamlessly without any reduction to information gain access to or lengthened failover home windows. You will generally only see 2-3 ping falls on the information IPs if you fail the Energetic controllers. The standard answer for the design will be as Tom pointed out: guaranteed SLAs upon faiIover. If you run active/active techniques with a greatest practice style of being able to handle failure of a controller, you would still run no more than 100% 'system' insert, which is what we perform on a single controller at all periods. If you keep in mind the Yahoo! Fantasy Soccer outage, a main cause for that had been overloading the techniques controllers on a failing and bringing down the whole program. An Energetic/Standby construction allows us to ensure that can'capital t take place. There't nothing at all that restricts us from operating Dynamic/Active, it had been simply a really conscious design objective. And yes, we also did happen to construct a REALLY coI filesystem in thé procedure :).